<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disdain for Plain English Can Doom  Promising Change Management Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pecchiacomm.com/2010/03/disdain-for-plain-english-can-doom-promising-change-management-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pecchiacomm.com/2010/03/disdain-for-plain-english-can-doom-promising-change-management-plans/</link>
	<description>Good. Fast. Easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.pecchiacomm.com/2010/03/disdain-for-plain-english-can-doom-promising-change-management-plans/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pecchiacomm.com/?p=127#comment-28</guid>
		<description>These sound like entries from Management Bingo we used to play at meetings at my last employer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These sound like entries from Management Bingo we used to play at meetings at my last employer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Delamater</title>
		<link>http://www.pecchiacomm.com/2010/03/disdain-for-plain-english-can-doom-promising-change-management-plans/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Delamater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pecchiacomm.com/?p=127#comment-27</guid>
		<description>In anticipation of the reception on my part of wisdom surpassed only by the insight that more than 20 years in communication disciplines has imbued you with, I with eagerness and curiosity commenced with the reading of your latest web blog missive, even as I set aside other more pressing details of this, the midpoint day of the month of March, in the year of our Lord 2010, and awaited the craftiness of your literary prose.
Instead, you cut to the chase. Darn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In anticipation of the reception on my part of wisdom surpassed only by the insight that more than 20 years in communication disciplines has imbued you with, I with eagerness and curiosity commenced with the reading of your latest web blog missive, even as I set aside other more pressing details of this, the midpoint day of the month of March, in the year of our Lord 2010, and awaited the craftiness of your literary prose.<br />
Instead, you cut to the chase. Darn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Swegan</title>
		<link>http://www.pecchiacomm.com/2010/03/disdain-for-plain-english-can-doom-promising-change-management-plans/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Swegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pecchiacomm.com/?p=127#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Spent several years working on a newsletter team at a former employer. The team as well as the target audience consisted of High School through College education. I was taught early on that spell check is not enough. Go one step further and do the grammar check. This caught many errors that slipped past spell check.
At the end of grammar check, a summary popped up with reading comprehension ratings. The average reading level in the US being about a 10th grade level it was easy to check how comprehensible an article would be. If the level spiked, determine why and if it needed to be changed. Often technical aspects will force this level up, but is the intended audience familiar with these aspects? If so don’t edit to death. If this was not the case then find a way to make it understandable.
Finally, don’t trust the computer. Read each others articles and ask yourself the ‘?”, “Did I understand what I just read?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spent several years working on a newsletter team at a former employer. The team as well as the target audience consisted of High School through College education. I was taught early on that spell check is not enough. Go one step further and do the grammar check. This caught many errors that slipped past spell check.<br />
At the end of grammar check, a summary popped up with reading comprehension ratings. The average reading level in the US being about a 10th grade level it was easy to check how comprehensible an article would be. If the level spiked, determine why and if it needed to be changed. Often technical aspects will force this level up, but is the intended audience familiar with these aspects? If so don’t edit to death. If this was not the case then find a way to make it understandable.<br />
Finally, don’t trust the computer. Read each others articles and ask yourself the ‘?”, “Did I understand what I just read?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim cartwright</title>
		<link>http://www.pecchiacomm.com/2010/03/disdain-for-plain-english-can-doom-promising-change-management-plans/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>jim cartwright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pecchiacomm.com/?p=127#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Amen.
For wordier examples than supplied by you friend, see any insurance policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.<br />
For wordier examples than supplied by you friend, see any insurance policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

